DIN ISO 34-1 Trouser, angle and crescent test pieces

Rubber, vulcanized or thermoplastic Determination of tear strength Part 1: Trouser, angle and crescent test pieces

National foreword

This standard has been prepared by ISO/TC 45 'Rubber and rubber products'. The responsible German body involved in its preparation was the Normenausschuss Materialprüfung (Materials Testing Standards Committee), Technical Committee Prüfung der physikalischen Eigenschaften von Kautschuk und Elastomeren.
DIN ISO 471 and DIN ISO 6133 *) are the standards corresponding to International Standards ISO 471 and ISO 6133, respectively, referred to in clause 2 of the ISO Standard. Amendments DIN 53507, March 1983 edition, and DIN 53515, January 1990 edition, have been superseded by the specifications of DIN ISO 34-1.
Previous editions DIN 53507: 1943-11, 1951-12, 1959-01, 1974-07, 1983-07; DIN 53515: 1959-03, 1962-10, 1977-08, 1990-01.





You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

1. Overview
The **DIN ISO 34-1** standard specifies methods for determining the tear strength of vulcanized or thermoplastic rubber. It evaluates how well the material resists tearing when subjected to a specified force. The test uses three types of test pieces: **trouser**, **angle**, and **crescent**.

---

2. Purpose of the Test
The tear strength test ensures:

• Material Integrity: Determines the resistance of rubber to tearing forces.
• Quality Control: Verifies the durability and performance of rubber materials during production and application.
• Comparative Analysis: Allows for the comparison of tear resistance between different materials or formulations.

---

3. Test Methods
DIN ISO 34-1 defines three methods based on the shape of the test piece:

• a. Trouser Test Pieces: 
  - A rectangular piece with a slit along its length to create two "trouser-like" legs. 
  - Force is applied to pull the legs apart, and the tear strength is measured.
• b. Angle Test Pieces: 
  - An angular cut in the test piece forms a sharp notch. 
  - The force is applied to propagate the tear from the notch, measuring resistance.
• c. Crescent Test Pieces: 
  - A crescent-shaped cut is made in the test piece. 
  - The force applied propagates the tear, and the resistance is measured.

---

4. Test Procedure
The procedure involves the following steps:

• a. Sample Preparation:
  - Test pieces are prepared according to the specific shape (trouser, angle, or crescent). 
  - Samples must be cut cleanly with no rough edges.
• b. Test Conditions:
  - Conduct the test at a standard temperature of **23°C ± 2°C** unless otherwise specified. 
  - Condition the samples in the test environment for at least **16 hours** before testing.
• c. Tear Strength Testing:
  - Place the sample in a tensile testing machine. 
  - Apply force at a constant rate of **500 mm/min (or as specified)**. 
  - Measure the force required to propagate the tear.

---

5. Calculation of Tear Strength
Tear strength (\( T \)) is calculated using the formula:

T = F / d

Where:
- \( T \): Tear strength (N/mm or lbf/in)
- \( F \): Maximum force applied to propagate the tear (N or lbf)
- \( d \): Thickness of the test piece (mm or in)

---

6. Applications
The tear strength test is widely used in:

• Automotive Industry: Tires, seals, and gaskets.
• Construction Materials: Rubber mats, roofing membranes, and vibration dampers.
• Consumer Products: Footwear, rubber bands, and sports equipment.

---

7. Conclusion
The **DIN ISO 34-1** tear strength test provides a standardized method for evaluating the tear resistance of vulcanized or thermoplastic rubber. By using trouser, angle, and crescent test pieces, manufacturers and engineers can ensure material durability and performance in various applications.

Key Highlights:

• Tear resistance is calculated based on the force required to propagate the tear.
• The test ensures compliance with quality standards and helps in material selection.
• Three types of test pieces are used: trouser, angle, and crescent.

References: DIN ISO 34-1, rubber material testing standards, and industry best practices.

---

Introduction
DIN ISO 34 specifies methods to determine the tear strength of vulcanized rubber or thermoplastic elastomers. Tear strength measures the material's ability to resist the propagation of a tear when under stress.

---

ISO 34-1:2004 Test Methods
ISO 34-1:2004 defines three test methods, each using a specific type of test piece. The method chosen depends on the material and precision requirements.

• Method A: Trouser test piece
• Method B: Angle test piece, with or without a specified nick depth
• Method C: Crescent test piece with a nick

---

1. Method A: Trouser Test Piece
Description: Uses a trouser-shaped specimen, where the material is cut into two legs, and the tear propagates from the crotch region.

Advantages:

• Insensitive to variations in the initial cut length.
• Provides more uniform tear propagation behavior.

Disadvantages:

• High variance in results:
     
  • Repeatability: 45%
  • Reproducibility: 72%

Preferred Application: Suitable for consistent evaluations where nick dimensions are less critical.

---

2. Method B: Angle Test Piece
Description: Uses an angle-shaped specimen, with or without a pre-cut nick at a specified depth.

Advantages:

• Better variance compared to Method A:
     
  • Repeatability: 28%
  • Reproducibility: 60%

Disadvantages:

• Sensitive to the precision of the nick's dimensions.

Preferred Application: Used when moderate variance is acceptable and nick control can be ensured.

---

3. Method C: Crescent Test Piece
Description: Uses a crescent-shaped specimen with a pre-cut nick.

Advantages:

• Commonly used for elastomers with predictable tear propagation.

Disadvantages:

• Highly sensitive to nick dimensions.
• Tear propagation results can be inconsistent if the nick varies.

Preferred Application: Suitable for materials where tear initiation is critical.

---

Comparison of Test Methods

Method	Test Piece	Variance	Advantages	Disadvantages
A (Trouser)	Trouser-shaped	Repeatability: 45% Reproducibility: 72%	Insensitive to nick length variations	High variability in results
B (Angle)	Angle-shaped	Repeatability: 28% Reproducibility: 60%	Improved precision over Method A	Sensitive to nick dimensions
C (Crescent)	Crescent-shaped	Not specified	Commonly used for tear initiation testing	Highly dependent on nick precision

---

Conclusion
The selection of the test method depends on the material and precision needed:

• Method A (Trouser): Preferred for general applications with less sensitivity to cut length.
• Method B (Angle): Offers better precision but requires strict control over nick depth.
• Method C (Crescent): Best suited for testing materials where tear initiation is critical but highly sensitive to nick dimensions.